Does "Set It & Forget It" Really Work?

Introduction

Q&A Blog: Set It and Forget It: Is It the Right Retirement Strategy?

To skip to the video, click here.

Remember the infomercial guy promising perfect rotisserie chicken if you'd just "set it and forget it"? It's a catchy phrase, but should you apply the same logic to your retirement portfolio? The idea of establishing an investment strategy and then letting it run on autopilot is appealing, especially for those who'd rather spend retirement living life than watching CNBC. But is it actually the best approach? Let's explore both sides.

Q1: What does a "set it and forget it" investment strategy actually look like?
In practice, it means you agree upon an initial asset allocation, rebalance at standard intervals (quarterly or annually), and then resist the urge to make changes based on market movements or hot stock tips. You stick to the original plan, take your required withdrawals, and let rebalancing and compounding do the work over time. It's not literally forgetting your money exists, but rather making less frequent adjustments than a more actively managed approach.

Q2: What are the strongest arguments for using a passive, set-it-and-forget-it strategy?
Proponents point to three main benefits. First, it removes emotion from investing—helping you avoid the "behavior gap" where investors typically underperform the very funds they own by buying high and selling low. Second, it lets retirees actually enjoy retirement instead of obsessing over market analysis. Third, history is on your side: the S&P 500 has produced positive returns in roughly three out of every four years since 1928. For those who can stomach the volatility, time in the market beats timing the market.

Q3: What are the risks of a passive strategy that active management might address?
The counterargument is compelling. Change is inevitable—both in your personal life and in global markets. There have been painful extended periods, like the "lost decade" from 2000-2010 when the S&P 500 delivered negative returns over ten full years. The 1970s brought high inflation that crushed both stocks and bonds. Additionally, "sequence of returns risk" means retirees who hit a bear market early in retirement face very different outcomes than those who retire during a bull market. An active strategy can potentially navigate these challenging environments.

Q4: Can a retiree realistically get their initial allocation "right" from day one?
Probably not. Constructing a portfolio involves dozens of decisions: stock/bond split, U.S. versus international allocation, emerging markets, alternatives, and more. The odds that you'll nail every decision perfectly at the outset are extremely low. Over time, you'll likely second-guess those choices anyway, potentially leading to emotional changes that defeat the purpose of your original strategy. This is where professional guidance can add significant value.

Q5: So which is it—should I set it and forget it or actively manage?
The honest answer is that both approaches can work, but the best strategy is whichever one you'll actually stick with over the long term. Passive investing flies in the face of basic human tendencies to fret, monitor, and adjust—especially during market turbulence. The role of a financial advisor is to shoulder that burden, providing a co-pilot to help navigate uncertain waters so retirees can actually enjoy the retirement they worked so hard to reach. Your investment strategy should give you peace of mind, not anxiety.